Ever since his 1998 directorial debut Following, one of the most prominent recurring themes throughout Christopher Nolan’s filmography is the concept and fragmentation of time. From Momento’s amnesiac hero Leonard who can’t remember the past, to Batman who has to stop a ticking nuclear bomb in The Dark Knight Rises, to Cooper fighting gravitational time dilation in Interstellar, time is something that drives almost all of his heroes.

Nolan’s latest film Dunkirk, based on the Dunkirk evacuation of the Second World War, centers on the four hundred thousand soldiers waiting for deliverance. Their enemy is not the German army, depicted here as a specter-like presence, but time itself as they try to survive by any means necessary until they can get home.

There have been numerous films that are based on this subject, from Leslie Norman’s 1958 film of the same name to the five-minute one-take sequence in Joe Wright’s Atonement. Nolan takes an unconventional approach to the historical event by interweaving three storylines covering different scopes of time during the evacuation. Once again, Nolan presents a non-linear narrative.  Unlike some of his previous films though, Dunkirk is kept short and focused, which is one of the film’s biggest advantages.

With stunning cinematography shot on IMAX 65mm film (see it in the IMAX format, it’s a must) by Hoyte van Hoytema, there is a strong sense of intimacy for such a large-scale story.  Whether it is the private boat of Mark Rylance’s Mr. Dawson, the cockpit of Tom Hardy’s Royal Air Force pilot or running alongside British Army privates played by newcomer Fionn Whitehead and One Direction’s Harry Styles, the film never loses the human stories. The historically accurate design and practical effects further increase the brutal realism Nolan expertly captures.

Given its ensemble of British acting veterans such as Mark Rylance, Kenneth Branagh and previous Nolan collaborators Tom Hardy and Cillian Murphy, Dunkirk is not consumed by character backstory nor big speeches, frequent trappings of war movies. Audiences might feel distant from the shallow characterization, but Nolan is more interested how this fight for survival psychologically motivates the soldiers rather than aggrandizing them.

In the end, Dunkirk is a rather atypical war movie. Enemies are unseen, words are unspoken, and the heroes are just trying to stay alive. In this stunningly tense, thoughtful film, time and survival waits for no man.

Dunkirk
Is it good?
Pushing the envelope in terms of technical craftsmanship from its IMAX cinematography and heart-thumping audio, Christopher Nolan's latest is an unconventionally intimate WWII epic, that has to be seen in your nearest, biggest screen.
Extensive use of practical effects in recreating the historical event
With a running time of 106 minutes, it moves at an intense heart-thumping pace
Hans Zimmer's score
An intimate examination of characters fighting for survival at a hopeless time
A cinematic experience that has to be seen on IMAX
It will leave people emotionally drained
Some dialogue hard to hear over background/score
Characters with little backstory
9.5
Great